Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJFE53F11X-B0511H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPositivo VJFE53F11X-B0511H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-IL
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 18:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 253
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 565
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.9
7% 8.83 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 3
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D512 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E990903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 232 228 192 216 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,625
Write 1,083
Mixed 954
SusWrite 290
219% 988 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 23.7
132% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 22.4
153% 358 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 145%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 04CB AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VJFE53F11X-B0511H Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE53F11X-B0511H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback