Today's hottest deals

Positivo VJFE43F11X-B0721H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemPositivo VJFE43F11X-B0721H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N14WP6-C
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 220
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 498
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
6.81% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 6
Parallax 12.1
8% 9.17 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 0.1
5% 7.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.81%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D256 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 180 178 223 142 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,758
Write 822
Mixed 695
SusWrite 228
192% 876 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 21.8
140% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 369
306% 438 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 146%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WB-BCRC 04CB AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 0 14" 1280 720 BOE07F6
Typical VJFE43F11X-B0721H Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE43F11X-B0721H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback