Today's hottest deals

MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 19:04
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 46
31% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 84.6
8-Core 126
13% 105 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 90.8
41% 61.8 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 46.3
48% 60.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 250GB SSD
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 114 108 110 57 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 176
Write 112
Mixed 112
SusWrite 84.3
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 11.7
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 23.6
DQ Mixed 17.7
14% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 105%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
103GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 114 108 111 57 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 294
Write 182
Mixed 213
SusWrite 84.6
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 21
68% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 34
28% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
216GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 105 111 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 71.3
Write 74.6
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 111
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 68%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB
300GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.1 9 9 9 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 26
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 9.1
16% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 93%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.3 8.4 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 25.1
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 8.5
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 59%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
34GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.4 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 16.4
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 8.3
23% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
388GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.4 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 24
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 8.3
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992104 (997104) 992104 (997104) F3-1866C10-8GSR F3-1866C10-8GSR 32GB
800, 800, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.9
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback