Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 216C
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170314
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 46.1
31% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 69.2
8-Core 80.6
10% 74.9 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
HP(103C 216C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 5.3
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 31 35 40 47 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 75.3
Write 178
Mixed 188
SusWrite 46
28% 122 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 10.8
33% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 23.2
39% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 5.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback