Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 356 46% 349 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 40.9 Parallax 38.3 30% 38.7 fps	MRender 36.1 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 27.3 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 480GB A800 480GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1207A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 33 46 38 39 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 308 Write 362 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 40.2 40% 182 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 20.7 55% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 71.5 DQ Mixed 0.8 30% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2,199x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	991x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	940x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	228x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	159x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	152x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16