Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory38.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 20:10
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$144
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 159
2-Core 314
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 888
89% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 116
Parallax 159
80% 124 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 77.1
74% 91.6 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 142 138 136 131 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 476
Write 198
Mixed 205
SusWrite 148
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 32.4
130% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 173
138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 442 444 445 445 449 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 442
Mixed 443
SusWrite 444
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 210
158% 211 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
680GB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3623 3732 2304 938 937 468 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 3,220
Mixed 2,056
SusWrite 2,000
521% 2,296 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 78.8
270% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 1179
863% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 331%
Great: 502%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 402 405 428 433 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 434
Mixed 350
SusWrite 420
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 41.8
149% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 206
155% 209 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 127 125 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 138
Write 149
Mixed 18
SusWrite 126
77% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-8GVKB F4-3200C16-16GVK 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 25.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 23.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $904
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback