Today's hottest deals

Asus H87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H87M-E  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 28.5
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 111
37% 69 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 206
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 125 144 132 136 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.1% Below average
Read 234
Write 153
Mixed 167
SusWrite 135
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 8.1
38% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 172
144% 210 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
306GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 158 158 156 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 96.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 156
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback