Chuwi Hi10 Go

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi Hi10 Go  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1200 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 03:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Memory 44
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 115
40% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 123
19% 138 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
USB Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.5 4.1 3.4 4.9 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.1
9% 8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x3GB
2 of 2 slots used
6GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
36% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback