Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-G7
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 666
62% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,215
75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5106AGLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1099 399 410 408 411 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1785
Write 1,616
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 523
281% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
195% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 556
409% 544 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 188%
Great: 242%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
931GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 271 303 278 303 287 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 51.2
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 37.9
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback