Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 21:29
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 700
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 68
46% 65.6 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 66.5
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 418
Write 81.8
Mixed 123
SusWrite 78.3
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 22.1
99% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 110
89% 128 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 122%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
349GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 465 451 453 458 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 457
Mixed 438
SusWrite 459
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 57.6
177% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
216GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 389 303 302 303 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,799
Write 1,277
Mixed 536
SusWrite 468
225% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 49.2
177% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 594
484% 694 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 188%
Great: 236%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
791GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72.9
Write 75.8
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 68.5
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim Mac SL 1TB
183GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 58.6
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 86.4
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 34
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $887
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback