Asus P5VD2-VM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5VD2-VM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 46.1
30% 42.5 Pts
4-Core 46.1
8-Core 45.7
6% 45.9 Pts
64-Core 46.2
3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6Y080P0 70GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 46 44 43 42 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 53
Mixed 39
SusWrite 43
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 27%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
145GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 119 119 115 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 117
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
3Q External USB 3.0 500GB
11GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 17.7
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5VD2-VM SE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5VD2-VM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback