Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170-Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '22 at 02:41
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 287
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 2424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 88.8
Reflection 102
Parallax 92.4
72% 94.3 fps
MRender 86.3
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 89.6
73% 88.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 417 421 418 416 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,674
Write 1,344
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 455
254% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 40.8
172% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 498
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 291
240% 349 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 164%
Great: 302%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
559GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 146 148 149 148 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 93.3
SusWrite 147
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 109%
Samsung Flash Drive 257GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 32 31 31 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 38.7
Write 18.2
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 30.7
37% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.7
388% 5.5 MB/s
DQ Read 7.2
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
445% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.1% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback