Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$218 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 87.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 288 94% 173 Pts	4-Core 578 8-Core 992 95% 785 Pts	64-Core 1,118 69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.9% Very good	Lighting 88.5 Reflection 113 Parallax 71.6 72% 91.1 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 91.7 Splatting 77.4 72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 970 2TB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 503 671 862 1036 857 970 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 971 Write 1,354 Mixed 988 SusWrite 816 233% 1,032 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 40.8 145% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 485 DQ Write 1,118 DQ Mixed 928 671% 844 MB/s
Poor: 169% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 345%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 970 500GB 451 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 554 635 674 617 616 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 814 Write 1,139 Mixed 855 SusWrite 599 192% 852 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 41.1 120% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 851 DQ Mixed 845 592% 730 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 278%
Toshiba MG04ACA200E 2TB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: FP4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 165 165 165 162 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 145 Write 162 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 165 97% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 108%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 8.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 170 168 164 172 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 149 Write 154 Mixed 99 SusWrite 168 194% 142 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 14,156 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 10.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,857x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,479x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,389x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	499x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	356x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	276x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $792

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16