Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 23:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 130
55% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 198
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 62.7
52% 64.7 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 62.3
54% 66 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 94 94 92 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 274
Write 110
Mixed 145
SusWrite 95.1
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 22.5
99% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 118
88% 115 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
109GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 58 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 51
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 56.5
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 45%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 181 182 183 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 174
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 182
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA1339.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-HD+ Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback