HP ProLiant ML110 G4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML110 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ML110 G4
Memory2.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 23:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 46.9
28% 41.3 Pts
4-Core 46.4
8-Core 46.4
6% 46.4 Pts
64-Core 46.2
3% 46.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Dell(1028 0402) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP DF072A9844 73GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 39 27 29 29 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
Read 83.8
Write 48.6
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 33.5
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 512, 1024, 512 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML110 G4 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP ProLiant ML110 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback