HP ProLiant ML150 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ML150 G3
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20070922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '16 at 10:27
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5110
PROCESSOR 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 36.8
27% 37 Pts
4-Core 60.1
8-Core 63.2
8% 61.7 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F5) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 7.12
Parallax 7.94
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.43
6% 6.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP DF072A9844 73GB
68GB free
Firmware: HPD0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
Read 89.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 87.3
66% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.47
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.87
178% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 50%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 72GB
67GB free
Firmware: 3000
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
Read 88.1
Write 85.3
Mixed 86.9
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.43
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.69
155% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 61%
HP DF072A9844 73GB
64GB free
Firmware: HPD0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
Read 89.3
Write 83.5
Mixed 88.1
66% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.85
176% 1.14 MB/s
HP DF072A9844 73GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
Read 78.5
Write 74.9
Mixed 66
55% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.64 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 160 32GB
30GB free, PID 1646
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 7.53
Mixed 11
15% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.51
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.02
40% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 3.8
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback