Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8570p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 8570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17A7
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 90
2-Core 151
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17A7) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB3i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 162 164 153 154 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 330
Write 215
Mixed 230
SusWrite 160
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 29
105% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 212
157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 19 19 19 19 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 92.2
Write 25.7
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 17.2
35% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8570p Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback