Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 15:09
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 530
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.8% Good
Lighting 79.4
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 74.5
65% 77.9 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 59.8
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 326 381 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 422
Write 349
Mixed 317
SusWrite 185
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 30.2
134% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 190
169% 252 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 96%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: 373
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 395 402 409 398 399 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback