HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '22 at 14:02
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 95.3 2-Core 188 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 327 47% 347 Pts	64-Core 341 21% 341 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.63% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.63% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 91 40 66 72 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 420 Write 403 Mixed 389 SusWrite 125 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 1.1 47% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 0.8 51% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 100%
Apricorn SATAWire 6G 128GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 78GB free Firmware: 1411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 20 22 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 23.9 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 21.8 20% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 6.5 1,123% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 22%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 1,481 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 10GB free, PID 09c2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.3 6.3 3.9 5.3 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	Read 32.4 Write 0.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.9 9% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C8 3x4GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,466x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,466x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	797x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,922x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	726x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	489x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	266x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	64x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16