Biostar NF520D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar NF520D3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 10:07
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 39.2
29% 41.7 Pts
4-Core 78.4
8-Core 84.9
11% 81.7 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A 320GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.2 9.6 11 19 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 11.8
Mixed 11.1
SusWrite 10.9
8% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
341GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 2.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 1.4
1% 1.05 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBXL0 8GB
533, 533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback