Today's hottest deals

MSI B85-IE35(MS-7820)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7820
MotherboardMSI B85-IE35(MS-7820)  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 12:52
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$43
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 207
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 396
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 61.9
52% 63.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 61.3
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 60GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0303B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 326
Write 264
Mixed 224
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 46
160% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 55.8
50% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 92%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
54GB free
Firmware: HP11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 47 48 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 3.2
Write 41.4
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 46
18% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
74GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 83.5
Write 83.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 67.4
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
114GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 46.4
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 39.7
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 41%
SSK HE-G3000 2TB
639GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 127 92 126 144 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 128
143% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5474-070.A00LF 99P5471-033.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.5% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-IE35(MS-7820) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI B85-IE35(MS-7820)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $553
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback