Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac14,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27ADBB7B4CEE8E61
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200412
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 23:13
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 410
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 775M
Apple(106B 0120) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 24
Parallax 30.2
20% 26.4 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 30
Splatting 22.3
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 48 74 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 19.5
Write 68
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 64.1
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 112 114 115 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 30
SusWrite 112
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
121% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 91%
SSK HE-G3000 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 167 198 200 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 204
Write 154
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 192
208% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,2 Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback