Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 171 65% 112 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 602 57% 471 Pts	64-Core 1,596 99% 1,596 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 27.3 Parallax 34.7 20% 28.9 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 28.1 Splatting 24.7 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 22%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.1% Poor	Lighting 28.4 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 30.2 23% 30.3 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 31.1 Splatting 21.8 23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 337 331 319 328 338 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 433 Write 397 Mixed 406 SusWrite 335 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 33.6 120% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 248 187% 251 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 118%
Mushkin MKNSSDSR250GB 250GB 1,384 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 199GB free Firmware: 2A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 404 401 408 417 418 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 427 Write 370 Mixed 375 SusWrite 411 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 15.9 84% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 33.3 64% 123 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ-1G4D 16x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.9% Very good	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 25.8 85% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 93%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	146x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	19x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16