Today's hottest deals

Asrockrack EPC602D8A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrockrack EPC602D8A  (all builds)
Memory104.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 16:37
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 140
56% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 547
49% 415 Pts
64-Core 1,168
72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)
47.3% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 58
Parallax 58
47% 58 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 58
Splatting 58
48% 58 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
491GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 72 76 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 450
Write 436
Mixed 405
SusWrite 77.3
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 36.2
122% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 116
120% 200 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
745GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 1450 1478 1310 1126 1151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,571
Write 1,386
Mixed 760
SusWrite 1,338
284% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 75.4
4K Mixed 42.8
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 333
249% 330 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 203%
Great: 302%
WD WD4003FFBX-68MU3 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 220 223 215 228 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 218
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 221
136% 186 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.6
330% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70BM0- 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPC602D8A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrockrack EPC602D8A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $495
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback