Today's hottest deals

Asrock M3A770DE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock M3A770DE  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 11:01
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 81.8
41% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 158
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Asus(1043 8303) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
7.99% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 4.1
9% 9.3 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 4.6
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.99%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 119 108 124 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.1% Below average
Read 198
Write 134
Mixed 105
SusWrite 118
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 16.5
72% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 20
23% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 73%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
148GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 84.5
Write 45.9
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 85.1
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A770DE Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3A770DE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback