Today's hottest deals

Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 41.1
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 101
32% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 175
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 3
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 4
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 775
Mixed 8.9
280% 392 MB/s
4K Read 129
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.2
5,520% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 74%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
50GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6.9 4.4 4.2 6.1 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 0.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 5.4
10% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback