Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '22 at 21:46
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 217 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 630 62% 505 Pts	64-Core 820 51% 820 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3734) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.2% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 91.3 Parallax 134 100% 116 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 105 Splatting 103 75% 89.3 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,399 Write 1,098 Mixed 1,043 262% 1,180 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 65.7 220% 74.5 MB/s	DQ Read 901 DQ Write 680 DQ Mixed 784 588% 788 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 28GB free Firmware: CXM02D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 257 262 271 243 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 410 Write 281 Mixed 274 SusWrite 242 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 22.3 94% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 98.8 DQ Mixed 148 122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 73%
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 149GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 89 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 87.5 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 89.9 59% 79.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 109 135 137 136 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 74.9 Write 124 Mixed 66 SusWrite 129 72% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 90%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 223GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 96 93 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 91.6 Write 88.8 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 94.8 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB 87,241 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 30.5 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 20.5 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,436x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)