Biostar H110MHC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H110MHC  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 00:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 202
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 326
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Biostar(1565 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6170
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 12.8
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871b 2.5 7mm 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT02D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 159 160 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 420
Mixed 390
SusWrite 161
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
203% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 346
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 173 168 159 133 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 433
Write 406
Mixed 253
SusWrite 172
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 38.2
145% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 204
172% 251 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110MHC Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H110MHC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback