MSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 267%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive457% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C60
MotherboardMSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 10:24
Run Duration461 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,150
102% 867 Pts
64-Core 5,846
362% 5,846 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
MSI(1462 3711) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 221
Reflection 338
Parallax 266
180% 275 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 222
Splatting 166
176% 223 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3456 3461 3468 1898 1680 1744 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
457% Outstanding
Read 3,011
Write 3,448
Mixed 3,156
SusWrite 2618
691% 3,058 MB/s
4K Read 84.5
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 120
393% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,376
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 1,193
899% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 457%
Great: 477%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
569GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 444 445 445 445 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 442
Mixed 407
SusWrite 444
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 51.3
166% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
608GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1504 1552 1529 1548 1572 1559 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,694
Write 2,112
Mixed 2,528
SusWrite 1,544
498% 2,219 MB/s
4K Read 83.5
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 118
386% 135 MB/s
DQ Read 1,445
DQ Write 1142
DQ Mixed 1269
956% 1,285 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 380%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3479 3482 3480 2347 1746 1721 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,034
Write 3,470
Mixed 3,164
SusWrite 2,709
699% 3,094 MB/s
4K Read 85.1
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 122
399% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 1142
DQ Mixed 1274
957% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 469%
Great: 477%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 456 456 455 456 456 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Asmedia USB-C3.1 Docking 1TB
778GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 480 480 480 480 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 464
Mixed 436
SusWrite 480
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 45.2
146% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 243
190% 266 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 79.3
MC Write 76.8
MC Mixed 74.9
220% 77 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 41.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 192%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $2,515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback