MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 10:40
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 684
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Asus(1043 05D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 137
Parallax 233
97% 163 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 126
Splatting 152
135% 167 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2375 2488 2444 2585 2584 2586 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,833
Write 2471
Mixed 1,973
SusWrite 2,510
498% 2,197 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66.6
213% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 688
DQ Mixed 806
608% 820 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 330%
Great: 486%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
5GB free
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 660
Write 765
Mixed 458
140% 628 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 66
216% 79.4 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 339
309% 487 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 223%
Amd-raid Array 2 358GB
54GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 146 139 139 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 388
Write 230
Mixed 401
SusWrite 141
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 20.9
79% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 37.8
90% 180 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 127%
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB
511GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 176 160 159 158 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 264
Write 263
Mixed 137
SusWrite 153
150% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
302% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 120%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160T KD48GU880-32A160T BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 30
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback