MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 226
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 676
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Asus(1043 05D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 135
Parallax 243
96% 165 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 125
Splatting 152
134% 167 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2269 2332 2366 2439 2295 995 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,870
Write 2,312
Mixed 1,964
SusWrite 2,116
468% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 64.4
208% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 952
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 802
606% 818 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 306%
Great: 486%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1043 1014 1040 1021 1006 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 991
Write 975
Mixed 953
SusWrite 1,027
223% 987 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 62.3
224% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 506
399% 541 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 196%
Great: 253%
Amd-raid Array 2 358GB
54GB free
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 949
Write 929
Mixed 461
173% 780 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 19.8
75% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 62.5
87% 156 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 127%
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB
511GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 198 185 169 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 108
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 184
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
231% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160T KD48GU880-32A160T BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 24GB
3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 32.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 26.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback