MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '22 at 06:15
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 245
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 905
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,446
90% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 160
Parallax 158
161% 172 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 142
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
801GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 158 170 172 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 2,306
Write 1,099
Mixed 2,178
SusWrite 165
319% 1437 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 52.8
192% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 602
470% 626 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 190%
Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 2 500GB
455GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 148 159 161 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 413
Write 443
Mixed 394
SusWrite 154
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 24.1
95% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 55.3
61% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 247%
Amd-raid Array 3 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 140 143 152 154 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 191
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 148
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91%
Great: 101%
Amd-raid Array 4 16TB
12TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 160 171 174 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 126
Mixed 103
SusWrite 167
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 2.4
608% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 30.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 32.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 2,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback