Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6346
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 919
83% 698 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-2Q
Nvidia(10DE 14D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
49% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
49% 60 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 129GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 164 147 143 146 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 167
Mixed 182
SusWrite 152
134% 180 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 4.4
743% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
207% Outstanding
MC Read 53
MC Write 136
MC Mixed 73.1
250% 87.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 14.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 207%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback