Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 960 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 896 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6346
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
Memory 38.2
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 173
52% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 163
24% 173 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-1B
Nvidia(10DE 1309) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (45 fps cap detected)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 45
Parallax 44.9
37% 44.9 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 11GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 71 72 84 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
Read 184
Write 89.4
Mixed 114
SusWrite 75.7
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.9
361% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Nutanix VDISK 86GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 70 69 61 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 177
Write 83
Mixed 117
SusWrite 70.3
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.5
449% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 16 7 60 27.9" 1920 960 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback