Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 07:36
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 653
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 175
Parallax 180
147% 178 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 156
Splatting 128
124% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 320 349 347 348 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 437
Write 410
Mixed 310
SusWrite 316
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 24.6
100% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 350
266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
17GB free
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 281 231 174 193 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 699
Write 251
Mixed 383
SusWrite 221
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 23.9
103% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 204
178% 269 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 160%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
987GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 78 78 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46% Average
Read 82.9
Write 78.2
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 77
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 25.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback