Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JP
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '22 at 04:21
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	34%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Memory 12.9 1-Core 13.7 2-Core 24.9 10% 17.2 Pts	4-Core 47.7 8-Core 59.9 7% 53.8 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.64% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 5.3 4% 8.83 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.9 3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.64% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P5 500GB 312 User benchmarks, average bench 288% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 786 981 1093 1142 969 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 1,236 Write 1,197 Mixed 1,140 SusWrite 1009 258% 1,145 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 24.9 84% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 98.9 DQ Write 82.3 DQ Mixed 93.2 69% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 431%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 15 15 15 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 121 Write 15.3 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 14.5 43% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.1 80% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 1,279 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.8% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 378 11% 378 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_F512JP

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	37x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	31x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	28x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	27x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	13x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	18x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	8x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBNvmeBench 117%, 2,488 samples	6x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	17x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	17x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 69%, 342 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16