Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS H920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB258
Memory	6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275 3,135 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 93 2-Core 162 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 396 46% 356 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2696 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 2.9 3% 2.9 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75 5,635 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: MH00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 65 35 46 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 12.8 Write 13.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 55.2 16% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 56%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75 5,635 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 136GB free Firmware: MH00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 81 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 67.5 Write 65.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 80.2 42% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 11.2 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS H920 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	9x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	6x
Core i7-3820QMIntel $275Bench 66%, 3,135 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	16x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	6x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 53%, 12 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 30%, 3 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16