Today's hottest deals

Mustek6376 Mecer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics80.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMustek6376 Mecer  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 156
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 225
27% 210 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 3303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2027 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.1% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
81% 104 fps
MRender 89.8
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 96.2
78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST4000NC000-1FR168 4TB
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CE03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 86 71 39 103 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 79.5
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mecer Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Mustek6376 Mecer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback