PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111110 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '22 at 04:15 |
Run Duration | 303 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
32GB free
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 125 125 122 121 MB/s
|
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 156 151 145 116 MB/s
|
86.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
66GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 26 35 42 33 39 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Passport 0820 500GB
8GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 24 23 MB/s
|
9.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 706x |
Core i7-2600Intel $158Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 626x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 325x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 153x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 92x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $65 |