Asus GD30CI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	87.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Asus GD30CI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GD30CI
Memory	16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170413
Uptime	22.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '22 at 00:29
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 86.2 2-Core 177 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 307 37% 284 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.5% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 123 Parallax 111 90% 115 fps	MRender 90.8 Gravity 112 Splatting 100 83% 101 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 356 Write 279 Mixed 237 64% 291 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 22 79% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 218 154% 198 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 51GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 95 132 108 134 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 86.2 Write 102 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 127 59% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 1,566 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.6 6.8 6.2 6.8 6.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 4 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 6.5 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB 1,772 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 20.9 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GD30CI Builds (Compare 590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Asus GD30CI

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	555x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	28x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	200x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	99x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	86x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	48x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	30x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	172x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	107x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16