Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 11:57
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 45.3 2-Core 90.2 46% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 176 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8354) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.5 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 120GB SSD 120GB 960 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 231 214 180 135 134 MB/s Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.9% Good	Read 249 Write 240 Mixed 238 SusWrite 185 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 31.2 104% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 178 129% 167 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 94%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 466GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 105 104 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 99.7 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 106 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%
WD Elements 2620 4TB 3,758 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 26 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 25.3 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 24.4 33% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 44GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	97x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	81x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	34x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	205x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	37x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	16x
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GBUnknownBench 33%, 46 samples	7x
ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 505 samples	7x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $116

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16