Asrock B75M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B75M  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 134
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 230
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 61.2
42% 49.3 fps
MRender 31.9
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 24.9
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 334 370 358 358 339 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 388
Write 288
Mixed 154
SusWrite 330
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 7
80% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 1.5
67% 158 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
132GB free
Firmware: CC82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 101 105 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 150
Write 89.2
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 102
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3320830AS 327GB
138GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 33
Write 14.5
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 35.1
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8783 SRT4G86U1-H9M 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B75M - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback