Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHuananzhi X99-F8  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory103.8 GB free of 112 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 166
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 663
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 2,202
136% 2,202 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 189
Parallax 180
140% 180 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 177
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B- 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 403 378 371 379 383 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.6% Excellent
Read 416
Write 407
Mixed 288
SusWrite 386
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 22.1
105% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 256
203% 282 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 104%
WDC WUH721818AL 18TB
10TB free
Firmware: W232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 195 198 197 196 197 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 229
Write 119
Mixed 170
SusWrite 196
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 1.4
47% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 8.1
DQ Mixed 5.9
4% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Asgard AN3 2TNVMe-M.2/80 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1811 1794 1803 1781 1815 1791 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,230
Write 1,869
Mixed 146
SusWrite 1,799
337% 1,511 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 69.7
231% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 687
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 590
439% 586 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 297%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC M393A4K40CB1-CRC M393A4K40BB1-CRC M393A4K40BB1-CRC 111GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 46.2
153% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback