Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X99-F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHuananzhi X99-F8  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory101 GB free of 112 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 05:29
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 140
59% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 556
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 1,781
110% 1,781 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 522.06
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 187
Parallax 179
138% 178 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 175
Splatting 122
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0B- 2TB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 381 385 335 368 389 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
Read 412
Write 438
Mixed 201
SusWrite 372
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 23
92% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 275
207% 278 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 104%
WDC WUH721818AL 18TB
9TB free
Firmware: W232
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 242 241 238 239 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 180
Write 179
Mixed 151
SusWrite 241
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 3.5
4% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 34%
Asgard AN3 2TNVMe-M.2/80 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1656 1658 1665 1669 1677 1665 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 1,748
Mixed 155
SusWrite 1,665
311% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 43.7
141% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 331
243% 321 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 240%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC M393A4K40CB1-CRC M393A4K40BB1-CRC M393A4K40BB1-CRC 111GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
MC Read 61.9
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 45.2
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-F8 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Huananzhi X99-F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $256
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback