HP Z210 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z210 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1587h
Memory	9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '17 at 20:38
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 81.9 2-Core 163 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 331 43% 326 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 65.5 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 58.4 53% 63.8 fps	MRender 70.2 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 69 56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 221 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 44 (A5) Unknown 100 100 55850959036 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 55 193273528352 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 266290593854 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 339 (EA) Unknown 100 100 879 (F1) Unknown 253 253 471 (F2) Unknown 253 253 889 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	44.8% Average	Read 469 Write 100 Mixed 136 51% 235 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 3.72 53% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 3.75 35% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 71%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 309GB free Firmware: V56OA7EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 145 145 38677315924 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11831 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 32 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28291 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 5092 (C0) Power-off retract count 89 89 13634 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 13634 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 249108561955 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 32 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 2201	38.9% Below average	Read 69.6 Write 65.7 Mixed 65.6 50% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.35 94% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148 4,794 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 128GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 88 35251721 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5254 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 82469056553 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21378 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4838 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 572588066 (C2) HDA temperature 34 50 42949672994 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 48 221578405 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 1111 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30% Poor	Read 53.1 Write 51.2 Mixed 52.6 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.33 75% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10600CL9-2GBNT Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333, 1600, 1778 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.9% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z210 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z210 Workstation

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	341x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	121x
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples	115x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	83x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16