MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B50
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 17:01
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 269
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 756
82% 648 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.2% Good
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 81.4
70% 85.1 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 70.2
68% 85.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
615GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1208 322 541 289 705 1353 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 1,402
Mixed 1,048
SusWrite 737
258% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 71.4
250% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 661
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 267
347% 613 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 214%
Great: 295%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
857GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 1182 1186 1182 1188 1184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,297
Write 1,189
Mixed 876
SusWrite 1,183
256% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 70.4
222% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 274
349% 614 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 229%
Great: 295%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB
168GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.6 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 83
Write 81.4
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 2.4
73% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 23%
WDC WD10 EZEX-21M2NA0 1TB
808GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 157 155 157 160 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
Read 164
Write 160
Mixed 128
SusWrite 157
206% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
131% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB
752GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 155 154 156 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.6% Good
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 114
SusWrite 155
194% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
114% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EFAX-68JH4N0 6TB
5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 3.5 3.3 2.7 2.3 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Read 194
Write 164
Mixed 110
SusWrite 3.4
144% 118 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 1.1
521% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
363% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
833GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 3 3.2 3 2.4 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 76.2
Write 75.8
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 3.4
72% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 59%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68N32N0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 151 156 158 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 154
Write 160
Mixed 126
SusWrite 155
203% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68N32N0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 153 157 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 119
SusWrite 156
197% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 176 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 127
SusWrite 176
216% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.3
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 21.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50) Builds (Compare 2,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B50)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $599
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback