Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 265
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 889
87% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 74
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 78
60% 80.4 fps
MRender 79.2
Gravity 75.2
Splatting 69.3
60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128S42CA00IS1 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 103 88 90 78 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 487
Write 199
Mixed 255
SusWrite 103
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 40.8
151% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 120
122% 199 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
893GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 195 196 198 197 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 76.5
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 193
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS7250SASUN500G 0719K428MF 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: K2AOAV0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 61 61 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 62.9
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 61.4
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 19.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 11.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback