Today's hottest deals

HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One 24-f0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8431
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 123
45% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 241
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 8431) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 90 135 152 159 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 161
Write 161
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 139
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One 24-f0xx Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 24-f0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback