Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80DW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80DW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B3
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 70.1
38% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 106
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3830) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.0.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.4
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.6
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 42 30 55 40 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 96.1
Write 50.9
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 40.7
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-BE Kingston HP594908-HR1-ELD 4GB
533, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 11.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80DW Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80DW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback