Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80EC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80EC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B3
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160727
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Memory 23.4
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 58.6
20% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 95.1
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 95.4
6% 95.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3830) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 5.3
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 104 147 185 170 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 336
Write 234
Mixed 160
SusWrite 160
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 5
30% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 48.5
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 21
29% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KETECH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.8
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 296
14% 296 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80EC Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80EC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback